Colourism

Reports today of the sentencing of a man who sold 20,000 bottles of illegal skin lightening products on Ebay has brought the issue of ‘colourism’ into the news.  Colourism is a system of inequality that views fairer hues as more beautiful than darker skin complexions. Studies have shown that it is often the reason behind skin lightening, a practice common among people from Black, Asian and minority ethnic communities in the UK, US and parts of the Caribbean and Africa. Many remain unaware of the health risks, including increased chances of skin cancer, plus liver and kidney damage. The lightening products routinely contain hydroquinone or corticosteroids, both banned and dangerous chemicals. One called ‘Pure White Dark Spot Corrector Serum’ contains both but does not list them as ingredients.

Labour MP Kim Johnson commented. “Illegal skin lightening products are incredibly dangerous, not just because of the physical harm they can do but also because they reinforce Eurocentric beauty standards and valorise fair skin at the expense of darker complexions. That this legacy of colonialist attitudes is still so prevalent and these products are still widely available in 2024 is a stain on our society, and must be stamped out. These attitudes stretch far beyond the realm of beauty standards and are reflected in the economic and structural oppression of people with darker skin.” She is calling for tougher government restrictions on the sale of these items.

Read more about this story here. Read more about colourism in the book ‘Shades of Black: The Origins of Colour Consciousness in the Caribbean’, available here.

Share:

More Posts

BBC Radio Manchester interview

MJR trustees Beatrice Smith and Paul Keeble were interviewed by Asthma Younus on BBC Radio Manchester on Sunday morning about the forthcoming screening of ‘After the Flood:

New Stop and Search Charter

London’s Metropolitan Police has published a “charter” for stop and search, two years after it was severely criticised in an independent review for “over-policing and under-protecting”